Brew Method: French Press (so a 5-6 minute read).
For close to 3 years now, the internet has been engulfed in a battle of cosmic proportions. The little guy battling for justice against corporate greed. Every race, nation, creed have united under one common banner: #ReleaseTheSnyderCut.
Opposing forces stood against them, in the name of common sense and status quo, enraged at the silly nature of these demands. Could a simple hashtag convince a film studio to release a movie that didn't really exist?
Or did it?
Well, in 2021, we will all witness
The short answer? Something unique, weirdly yes, and sure! Let's dive in.
Question 1: What exactly should we expect from this?
Per the Hollywood Reporter and Variety, Zack and Deborah Snyder received a call from their agent indicating that CEO of WB Toby Emmerich was acknowledging the weight behind the 2 year movement to #ReleaseTheSnyderCut.
To understand the importance of this call, we need to understand the debacle that was the Justice League release. The short version is: after the poor critical and divided fan reception to Batman v. Superman, Snyder's vision for DC's answer to the MCU and Avengers was being doubted by WB executives, and they wanted changes made to the upcoming Justice League. This would be ok if they weren't already well underway into production. The script? Locked in and set up by Batman v. Superman. The direction? Debated by Snyder and WB executives. To say that the production was rough would be a massive understatement.
Once filming was wrapped and post production was underway, it still was not clear who's vision would pull through: Snyder's or the executives. Due to a family tragedy, Snyder voluntarily left post production duties and handed them over to Joss Whedon. Whedon promptly took the notes of exectives and reshot the majority of the film (reports indicate it was anywhere from 50-80% of the film), resulting in a film that felt cobbled together with the grandiose mythic quality brought by Snyder and Whedon's trademark comedy and whit, along with unfinished effects, cheap looking sets, and that mustache thing.
The film bombed (although the critical reception was not bad, weirdly enough), but diehard fans were not satisfied. They were convinced that somewhere existed a version of the film that was closer to Snyder's original vision. Impossible, right? He couldn't have had this film finished, only to have it remade by someone else. Even if it did exist, it would NEVER see the light of day, right?
That's what made this phone call in November 2019 so intriguing. The same studio that once demanded the film be changed asked if he would like to finish what he had started. The deal reportedly includes $20-30 million to finish effects, ADR (with original cast), and score the film. There's indication that the finished product could be a 4 hour film, broken up into individual "chapters."
The end result will be no excuses: Snyder is being given the chance of a lifetime to finish his vision and present it in a way that, while not FULLY being the vision he had, can give a more than satisfactory product. Will it be a great film? Maybe not, but it will present what he had in mind from the beginning, and that's all anyone that understands the artistic process can ask for.
Even for someone who thought this Snyder Cut could happen but in an unfinished manner, this blew my mind. But should it have? If anything, Warner Bros. would be the studio that would give a second chance to an unfinished vision.
Question 2: Has anything like this happened before?
In short: yes.
In a little big longer but still short: yes, and with the SAME STUDIO too.
Let's fly really quickly around the world and reverse time to 1978.
Drama behind the scenes of the production of the movie that made you believe a man could fly made the director want to permanently ground a producer. Richard Donner and Warner Bros. had agreed upon an ambitious task: Donner would film Superman: the Movie and Superman II back to back in order to make the best use of time with the stars they had (Gene Hackman, Marlon Brando, Marlon Brando's Cue Cards). But in May 1977 (3 months into filming), Donner found himself 2 weeks behind schedule and over budget, which concerned with the higher ups, namely Pierre Spengler. The tensions between Donner and Spengler became so high that they ceased talking directly to one another, and WB had to hire an additional producer to essentially be a middle man.
Fast forward to July 1977: WB unilaterally decided to scrap filming Superman II until they had completed Superman: the Movie, a decision that undoubtedly frustrated Donner who had already completed 75% of the filming for the sequel. They finished the first movie, and in 1978 it became the world-wide phenomenon we know it to be today. With the world loving Donner's Superman, the inevitable question became: when can we see more?!?
Donner was prepared to get back to work, but upon hearing that his own personal Lex Luthor Pierre Spengler would once again produce, Donner stated "if he's on it--I'm not!" Donner also stated that he wanted to make the film "on my own terms" and without any input from Spengler. WB's response? They hired Richard Lester, the additional producer hired to be the middle man between Donner and Spengler on Superman: the Movie, to direct Superman II, and notified Donner via telegram that his "services were no longer needed."
The resulting movie was a strange mix of Donner's "grandiose mythic" style from Superman: the Movie and Lester's penchant for comedy (sound familiar?), a fact that was not lost on critics. The comedic tone continued for the sequels, and the overall series never truly recovered.
The rumors permeated for years about what Donner's version of the film would actually have been like, resulting in a bootlegged "Superman II: Restored International Cut" in 2004 and eventual lawsuit from WB.
It was clear: the fanbase wanted to see Donner's version. Finally, in 2012, the combination of fan pressure and the blu-ray release of Superman: the Movie and Superman Returns combo pack, WB called Richard Donner about piecing together "The Donner Cut." As one producer at WB said, it only happened because "the fans pounded Warner Brothers [with] emails and home video and the head of the studio." Together with Donner and the Warner archive, they used test footage, deleted scenes, and the 75% that Donner originally filmed to help him "complete" his vision for the now 30+ year old film.
Question 3: Should anyone outside of hardcore DC movie fans even care?
This and variations of this question are the typical response I see to the news of the Snyder Cut online. People claiming "why do I care that another version of a bad movie is coming out?" or "I hated all the other movies so who cares?" And that's a fair sentiment.
Another reaction has been that this sets a dangerous precedent. If fans don't like something, they can bully and complain and troll online for long enough to finally get their own way. I understand where that's coming from: a vocal minority of this #ReleaseTheSnyderCut movement have been obnoxious and straight up toxic, and this looks like a reward for them.
But on the other hand, this is a creator getting a second chance. Warner Bros., a proven reactionary studio (they've done it twice with Superman-related properties), took the creative reigns away from a filmmaker in the middle of him doing his job. Now he's getting another shot to get what he originally intended into the world. Again, will this fix the film comparative to the theatrical version? I highly doubt it would make anyone who disliked Man of Steel, Batman v. Superman, or Justice League become a fan of those films. But it will help show what his intent was so we as filmgoers can have an informed debate as to whether it was a good direction.
So should you care? Sure! It's a win for a creator wanted to see his vision fulfilled. It's also ok not to care about this. I'm a fan of Man of Steel and Batman v. Superman (Ultimate Edition). I cannot physically bring myself to pick up a copy of Justice League and have not seen it since it came out in theaters, so that tells you where I'm coming from when I say: I'm super excited to see this version. I have no idea if it will be better and there's a great chance it won't be, but I'm ready to see what the filmmaker originally intended. And in the end, seeing someone get the opportunity to finish what they started (and not having to wait 30 years to do it) is something we ALL should be able to get behind.
What do you think? Are you excited about the Snyder Cut or could you not care less?
NOTES:
Here's where you can read up on the stuff we used to read up on the Donner Cut of Superman II (the majority of quotes have a linked webpage embedded):
Fast forward to July 1977: WB unilaterally decided to scrap filming Superman II until they had completed Superman: the Movie, a decision that undoubtedly frustrated Donner who had already completed 75% of the filming for the sequel. They finished the first movie, and in 1978 it became the world-wide phenomenon we know it to be today. With the world loving Donner's Superman, the inevitable question became: when can we see more?!?
Donner was prepared to get back to work, but upon hearing that his own personal Lex Luthor Pierre Spengler would once again produce, Donner stated "if he's on it--I'm not!" Donner also stated that he wanted to make the film "on my own terms" and without any input from Spengler. WB's response? They hired Richard Lester, the additional producer hired to be the middle man between Donner and Spengler on Superman: the Movie, to direct Superman II, and notified Donner via telegram that his "services were no longer needed."
The resulting movie was a strange mix of Donner's "grandiose mythic" style from Superman: the Movie and Lester's penchant for comedy (sound familiar?), a fact that was not lost on critics. The comedic tone continued for the sequels, and the overall series never truly recovered.
The rumors permeated for years about what Donner's version of the film would actually have been like, resulting in a bootlegged "Superman II: Restored International Cut" in 2004 and eventual lawsuit from WB.
It was clear: the fanbase wanted to see Donner's version. Finally, in 2012, the combination of fan pressure and the blu-ray release of Superman: the Movie and Superman Returns combo pack, WB called Richard Donner about piecing together "The Donner Cut." As one producer at WB said, it only happened because "the fans pounded Warner Brothers [with] emails and home video and the head of the studio." Together with Donner and the Warner archive, they used test footage, deleted scenes, and the 75% that Donner originally filmed to help him "complete" his vision for the now 30+ year old film.
Question 3: Should anyone outside of hardcore DC movie fans even care?
This and variations of this question are the typical response I see to the news of the Snyder Cut online. People claiming "why do I care that another version of a bad movie is coming out?" or "I hated all the other movies so who cares?" And that's a fair sentiment.
Another reaction has been that this sets a dangerous precedent. If fans don't like something, they can bully and complain and troll online for long enough to finally get their own way. I understand where that's coming from: a vocal minority of this #ReleaseTheSnyderCut movement have been obnoxious and straight up toxic, and this looks like a reward for them.
But on the other hand, this is a creator getting a second chance. Warner Bros., a proven reactionary studio (they've done it twice with Superman-related properties), took the creative reigns away from a filmmaker in the middle of him doing his job. Now he's getting another shot to get what he originally intended into the world. Again, will this fix the film comparative to the theatrical version? I highly doubt it would make anyone who disliked Man of Steel, Batman v. Superman, or Justice League become a fan of those films. But it will help show what his intent was so we as filmgoers can have an informed debate as to whether it was a good direction.
So should you care? Sure! It's a win for a creator wanted to see his vision fulfilled. It's also ok not to care about this. I'm a fan of Man of Steel and Batman v. Superman (Ultimate Edition). I cannot physically bring myself to pick up a copy of Justice League and have not seen it since it came out in theaters, so that tells you where I'm coming from when I say: I'm super excited to see this version. I have no idea if it will be better and there's a great chance it won't be, but I'm ready to see what the filmmaker originally intended. And in the end, seeing someone get the opportunity to finish what they started (and not having to wait 30 years to do it) is something we ALL should be able to get behind.
What do you think? Are you excited about the Snyder Cut or could you not care less?
NOTES:
Here's where you can read up on the stuff we used to read up on the Donner Cut of Superman II (the majority of quotes have a linked webpage embedded):
-https://filmschoolrejects.com/24-things-we-learned-from-the-superman-ii-the-richard-donner-cut-commentary-4a97c1783dcc/
-https://www.supermanhomepage.com/movies/movies.php?topic=sup2-RIC-review
-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtYkdt4LjiY&index=4&list=PLvJw6yjjzAGsUjPyNDtLxueR3PcouvcWl
-https://archive.org/details/starlog_magazine-020/page/n39/mode/2up
-https://www.supermanhomepage.com/movies/movies.php?topic=sup2-RIC-review
-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtYkdt4LjiY&index=4&list=PLvJw6yjjzAGsUjPyNDtLxueR3PcouvcWl
-https://archive.org/details/starlog_magazine-020/page/n39/mode/2up









